Official complaint and discipline documents

As part of our mission, the Office of Police Oversight publishes official documents related to the complaint investigation process and disciplinary decisions made by the Austin Police Department.

August 18, 2020

Written reprimand of Officer Justin Crook

Commander Rogers delivered a written reprimand to Officer Crook for not entering the identifying information or version of events of a subject involved in an incident. His actions violated policy 402.2.2 (a).

Author: Austin Police Department
Document: Written Reprimand: Officer Crook (PDF 551.27KB)
August 14, 2020

Formal complaint: Purpose and scope—Community policing and other policy violations

Complainant alleges Austin police officers used excessive force in response to peaceful protesters, resulting in injuries. The Office of Police Oversight recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.

Author: Office of Police Oversight
August 14, 2020

Formal complaint: Purpose and scope—Community policing and other policy violations

Anonymous complainant submitted a photograph from a recent protest, alleging that an Austin police officer sprayed protesters in the face at close range. The Office of Police Oversight recommends this allegation receive an A classification.

Author: Office of Police Oversight
August 14, 2020

Formal complaint: Purpose and scope—Community policing and other policy violations

Complainant alleges an officer used excessive force against a peaceful protester, with multiple officers restraining a woman and causing injuries. The Office of Police Oversight recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.

Author: Office of Police Oversight
August 14, 2020

Formal complaint: Purpose and scope—Community policing and other policy violations

Complainant alleges that Austin police officers used excessive force against them while taking photographs at a recent protest, despite a commanding officer approving their location. The Office of Police Oversight recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.

Author: Office of Police Oversight
August 14, 2020

Formal complaint: Purpose and scope—Community policing and other policy violations

Complainant alleges that Austin police officers may have violated policy during protests. The Office of Police Oversight recommends this allegation receive an A classification.

Author: Office of Police Oversight
August 14, 2020

Formal complaint: Purpose and scope—Community policing and other policy violations

Complainant alleges an officer used excessive force against a peaceful protester, with multiple officers restraining a woman and causing injuries. The Office of Police Oversight recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.

Author: Office of Police Oversight
August 14, 2020

Formal complaint: Purpose and scope—Community policing and other policy violations

Complainant alleges that Austin police officers used excessive force against them while taking photographs at a recent protest, despite a commanding officer approving their location. The Office of Police Oversight recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.

Author: Office of Police Oversight
August 14, 2020

Formal complaint: Purpose and scope—Community policing and other policy violations

Complainant alleges that Austin police officers may have violated policy during protests. The Office of Police Oversight recommends this allegation receive an A classification.

Author: Office of Police Oversight
August 12, 2020

Formal Complaint: Responsibility to Know and Comply, Retaliation Prohibited, Honesty, and other policy violations

Complainant alleges that Austin police supervisors falsified timesheets per a directive and pressured a subordinate to participate. The subordinate refused and was allegedly subjected to retaliation. The Office of Police Oversight recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.

Author: Office of Police Oversight
1
2
3
4
5
6
...
feedback

Did you find what you were looking for on this page?